2007-04-18, 14:27
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
Preamp -> Tube Head??
Greetings!
I have a question concerning these rackmount preamps. Can you run one of these into a normal tube amp head and just use the power section of the head somehow? Is that common? How is this be accomplished correctly? Does that cause any stress to the preamp or poweramp section of the head? A guy has a preamp for sale and I was wondering if it would integrate with my all tube amplifier head. Also... what exactly is speaker emulation? Thanks all!
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
Last edited by davie_gravy : 2007-04-18 at 14:35.
|
2007-04-18, 15:26
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mordor/England
Posts: 1,363
|
|
i think you can run the preamp through the effects loop of your head and it takes preceddence over the head pre amp, but i m not to sure. I remember alex skolnick talking about that somewhere. Give it a bash
__________________
"many a time newcastle brown hath cometh to my rescue" blizzard beast
Sold my shit, now its time to PARTY!!!!!
|
2007-04-18, 15:52
|
|
Supreme Metalhead
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Coast
Posts: 839
|
|
Yes you can, all you need to do is plug the preamp into the FX return of your amp.
__________________
"So often our hands get caught up in ruts of muscle memory. 'Muscle memory' is an accurate term. We get used to doing certain things, without even being aware of them. This ultimately not only shapes and therefore limits our technique, it also shapes what we compose, what we write. We end up thinking still unknowingly trapped in that box." -Adam Nitti
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_bleeding
buy a stick of graphite (art stores) and rub it into your nut
|
|
2007-04-18, 18:39
|
TEH PWNZOR!!!1qa
Alumni Staff
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The West.
Posts: 4,433
|
|
I ran my engl 530 into the fx return of my powerball nand it worked perfectly.
__________________
Friends don't let friends play Krank!
|
2007-04-18, 19:20
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: vlissingen, the Netherlands
Posts: 2,680
|
|
like they sayd, run it through the fx loop, since the fx loop bypasses the preamp section of the head, youll only use the poweramp section of the head...
kinda useless post i guess but i figuerd id explain why it works.
__________________
< no wonder hes mad!!
|
2007-04-18, 20:01
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,841
|
|
Speaker emulation means that you can run the preamp directly into a mixer, and straight into a computer. It's basically just a fancy EQ (you can get somewhere in the region by setting the EQ curve to be a 'sad face' with a little dip at the top (so you get two peaks), basically copying the response curve of a speaker). But it makes the world of difference, as you don't get that nasty 'fizzly' sound as you normally do when you plug directly into a computer. Won't really help much if you're going into an amp -> speaker, as you've got an actual speaker there, so there's no need for emulation
And as others have said, plug it into the FX return... or get a Laney tube amp, which has a 'Power Amp In' connection
__________________
The Freedom of Chaos
The Secret of The Secret
The Truth of The Truth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undone
moonraven?....more like ass raven
|
|
2007-04-19, 14:21
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
Excellent replies all! So let me get the terminology correct. FX return is the equivalent of preamp in or power amp in? What is FX send? Thanks all!
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
|
2007-04-19, 14:46
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land of Dust
Posts: 3,551
|
|
FX send is basically your amp's preamp-out, so you can send your amp's sound through all the pedals in your rig, sending it back into the return. The FX loop is essentially a gap between the preamp and poweramp where placing modulation effects tends to work best.
And yeah you can use this to bypass the amp's preamp completely by plugging in a preamp into the FX return, just using an amphead as a poweramp. You can make very good use of a shitty amp head like this.
A lot of people use Peavey Classic 30 tube heads like poweramps running PodXT's into their return.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by far_beyond_sane
(Did you know In Flames had a 2005 album called "Come Clarity"? How prophetic. I think they're trying to tell us all their sperm are dead.)
|
|
2007-04-19, 21:05
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
Awesome! That's what I wanted to know. I never knew exactly what the fx send and receive were but now that you explain it in terms of the preamp and power amp sections of the amp, it makes perfect sense. Much appreciated. Anyone familiar with the Marshall JMP-1? I got a guy that has one for sale for $400 in mint condition. Anyone care to comment goods or bads about this preamp? Thanks!
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
Last edited by davie_gravy : 2007-04-19 at 21:14.
|
2007-04-19, 21:49
|
|
Senior Metalhead
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 398
|
|
What kind of tone do you want? The JMP-1 does that hotrodded 80's-90's marshall thing quite well. Overall tight, open, non-compressed, marshall-y character, which means there are a lot of high mids and not so much low mids, as opposed to a more "modern" focused compressed sound with less high mids (ENGL, Boogie). Think "a little brighter 5150 with a little less gain" type of tone. Nice for leads and rock'n'roll.. Test it before you buy it.
Heard it is decent for what it does, that price is good if you're in the USA.
__________________
Proud member of the "$20000 worth of pro gear but can't play worth shit" squad
|
2007-04-20, 11:52
|
|
FUCKING HOFF-STYLE!!!!!!!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,550
|
|
I ran a preamp into the Slave Input on my Laney.
__________________
When faced with a difficult situation, Jesus asks himself, "What would Chuck Norris do?"
|
2007-04-20, 19:40
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jopop
What kind of tone do you want? The JMP-1 does that hotrodded 80's-90's marshall thing quite well. Overall tight, open, non-compressed, marshall-y character, which means there are a lot of high mids and not so much low mids, as opposed to a more "modern" focused compressed sound with less high mids (ENGL, Boogie). Think "a little brighter 5150 with a little less gain" type of tone. Nice for leads and rock'n'roll.. Test it before you buy it.
Heard it is decent for what it does, that price is good if you're in the USA.
|
Interesting characteristics. I'm not really sure what I'm looking for. I'm currently running a Peavey VTM120. It really gives me that crunchy high gain rhythm sound, but doesn't stand up for leads. Leads sound muddy and have no cut. This marshall might be just the thing I need. Thanks for the reply!
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
|
2007-04-20, 21:15
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land of Dust
Posts: 3,551
|
|
Uh before spending cash on a spare preamp, why not try an EQ pedal with your amp for leads if you already like it's rhythm channel? Boost mids in front of it or in the loop.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by far_beyond_sane
(Did you know In Flames had a 2005 album called "Come Clarity"? How prophetic. I think they're trying to tell us all their sperm are dead.)
|
|
2007-04-21, 08:41
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
It has some dip switches on the front of it... low mid and high boosts. I never really messed with them much, but the tubes need replaced badly, so that's my first thing to do. I was just wondering about preamps because this dude is wanting to get rid of this Marshall JMP-1.
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
|
2007-04-21, 09:50
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land of Dust
Posts: 3,551
|
|
An EQ pedal will do more shaping than those switches, but it doesn't hurt to try them. Buy a cheap EQ like an MXR 6 band with your new tubes and with a little patience I'm pretty sure you won't be lacking any definition in the lead department.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by far_beyond_sane
(Did you know In Flames had a 2005 album called "Come Clarity"? How prophetic. I think they're trying to tell us all their sperm are dead.)
|
|
2007-04-23, 02:28
|
New Blood
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34
|
|
Be aware of one thing......if you use an eq pedal in your fx loop to boost the amp for leads, it may not work out the way you want it. Why? Becuase most amp fx loops like to see line levels, and pedals are not line level. You may get unwanted distortion if you try a pedal in the loop. Does the amp have any level knobs for the fx loop? If not, get an Alesis Quadraverb processor and use it's eq and delay, and set the patch as a volume boost. It has in and out level knobs on the front, a bypass jack so you can turn it off with a simple switch, and is very cheap....I just bought one for $80. It will work out better, since you'll get some cool delays or anything else you want for leads. Better value.
__________________
-------------
GEAR:
*White '76 RI Explorer
*Blue Ibanez RG520QS
*BYOC overdive, chorus
*MXR Phase 90, Blue Box
*SD Pickup Booster
*EB JR volume
*Marshall JCM800 2210 head
*Marshall JCM800 4x12 cab w/Vintage 30's
*Line 6 Spider II 30 1x12 practice amp
|
2007-04-23, 09:27
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land of Dust
Posts: 3,551
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grindchord
Be aware of one thing......if you use an eq pedal in your fx loop to boost the amp for leads, it may not work out the way you want it. Why? Becuase most amp fx loops like to see line levels, and pedals are not line level. You may get unwanted distortion if you try a pedal in the loop. Does the amp have any level knobs for the fx loop? If not, get an Alesis Quadraverb processor and use it's eq and delay, and set the patch as a volume boost. It has in and out level knobs on the front, a bypass jack so you can turn it off with a simple switch, and is very cheap....I just bought one for $80. It will work out better, since you'll get some cool delays or anything else you want for leads. Better value.
|
The FX loop is meant to be used with effect pedals man. I've used various pedals including EQ even for line/volume boosts with great success in the FX loop of several amps, no unwanted fizz or tone loss of any sort. The only thing you shouldn't be using in the loop is a wah or an overdrive.
Why would he buy a reverb unit if all he wants is some different EQ?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by far_beyond_sane
(Did you know In Flames had a 2005 album called "Come Clarity"? How prophetic. I think they're trying to tell us all their sperm are dead.)
|
|
2007-04-23, 14:25
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
There are no controls for the level of fx loop. The conversation is how I could get a better lead tone out of my amp, since I was looking into a preamp, but this raises a good question. Is it better to run pedals and/or multi-effects processors through the fx loop or through standard in on an amp?
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
|
2007-04-23, 14:52
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land of Dust
Posts: 3,551
|
|
It really depends the kind of effect you want. If you want to clear the mud out of a guitar and give it a nice little sensitivity boost for leads, you want it in front of the amp, with a mid spike and the volume control a bit up. Same with overdrive(they really only work in front of amps). BUT an EQ in the loop can also make HUGE changes in your amp's overall tone. Use the same setting(parabola shaped mid spike with a slight volume boost) for leads and it will make a dramatic change in your sound, like if it was a perfectly studio'd up solo. Or use it to slightly boost bass response to get more mass and chunk out of thin sounding amps, it'll do wonders on combo amps.
FX like delay, chorus, reverb, phaser, and flanger etc. 99% of the time in all high gain music will sound better after the distortion, therefore in the FX loop. They'll sound more saturated that way, but tape delays are commonly used in front of amps too, however it's mostly used for that slap back 50's rockabilly guitar effect.
You just want better lead tone, so get an EQ pedal and take advantage of what your VTM has to offer. If you're still not satisfied with the VTM after you experiment with it and an EQ, then sell it and get a different amp or a rack setup(ie: that marshall JMP and a normal poweramp).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by far_beyond_sane
(Did you know In Flames had a 2005 album called "Come Clarity"? How prophetic. I think they're trying to tell us all their sperm are dead.)
|
|
2007-04-24, 14:09
|
|
Metal As Fuck!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LR AR
Posts: 2,680
|
|
Killer post Soreu! Appreciate the info bro.
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
R.I.P. Dimebag
My Music
BuildTheMusic.com is your #1 FREE online guitar resource center.
|
2007-04-24, 14:20
|
|
Post-whore
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Land of Dust
Posts: 3,551
|
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by far_beyond_sane
(Did you know In Flames had a 2005 album called "Come Clarity"? How prophetic. I think they're trying to tell us all their sperm are dead.)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|