Shut the fuck up you whiney emo bitch, you're supposed to only talk about music remember?


Yeah, the problem with republicans is that they're not nearly conservative enough. They like to tout that they're "conservative" just like the religious right does. In fact they're far from it, seems like the only two choices we have anymore is moderate and far left. Fucking sucks, fiscally and as far as our civil liberties I'm as conservative as you can get. You could probably classify me as an Anarcho-Capatalist. Also, I find it fairly amusing that the republican party has pretty much abandoned the religious right and that the religious right hasn't figured that out yet.

__________________

sorry bi-anus.
when morons like you feel compelled to spew your idiocy, i can't resist.

__________________

Gee the "I'm not even going to read your arguments" "you're a moron" comeback. If you want to comment on something I said, read it first dipshit.

__________________

yeah.
lighten up bud
i've read your opinions. I highly disagree. You just seem to think everyone who disagrees with your (godly) opinions are idiots. People who disagree with mine have there own. You though, my friend, are an idiot.

i'd tell you to suck my dick, but i get the vibe that you would


I've read what you've typed. that's my only comment for now.
It's all you're worth.

but as a human, i love you.
and that'll piss you off more. Because a mind like yours seems to not be able to grasp the concept of love. You're a true cynic my man. You hate because you can. I respect you. I love you . But brother, i do think you're an idiot.

__________________

Ironic that I never attacked you for your opinion, yet since you disagree with mine instead of refuting it intelligently you call me a moron or an idiot. Typical.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

__________________

Now your racist. saying that black people smoke pot and steal kettles
what am i gonna do with you.



Shut the fuck up you whiney emo bitch, you're supposed to only talk about music remember?
attack opinion
attack
because of opinion
black pot smoking kettle stealers

__________________

There is no global warming. Period.

You can't find a real scientist anywhere in the world who can look you in the eye and, without hesitation, without clarification, without saying, kinda, mighta, sorta, if, and or but...say "yes, global warming is with us."

There is no evidence whatsoever to support such claims. Anyone who tells you that scientific research shows warming trends - be they teachers, news casters, Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents or Presidents - is wrong. There is no global warming.

Scientific research through U.S. Government satellite and balloon measurements shows that the temperature is actually cooling - very slightly - .037 degrees Celsius.

A little research into modern-day temperature trends bears this out. For example, in 1936 the Midwest of the United States experienced 49 consecutive days of temperatures over 90 degrees. There were another 49 consecutive days in 1955. But in 1992 there was only one day over 90 degrees and in 1997 only 5 days.

Because of modern science and improved equipment, this "cooling" trend has been most accurately documented over the past 18 years. Ironically, that's the same period of time the hysteria has grown over dire warnings of "warming."

Changes in global temperatures are natural. There is no proof that temperature is affected by anything that man has done.

In fact, recent severe weather has been directly attributed to a natural phenomenon that occurs every so often called El Nino. It causes ocean temperatures to rise as tropical trade winds actually reverse for a time.

The resulting temperature changes cause severe storms, flooding and even draught on every continent on earth.

It's completely natural. El Nino has been wreaking its havoc across the globe since long before man appeared.

How about the reports that the polar ice cap is melting?

Well, yes it is. In fact, it has been for about a million years or so. We are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North American and Northern Europe.

There's at least one environmentalist, named Al Gore, who is panicking over the possibility that we may soon lose Glacier National Park in Montana because the ice is melting.

One hates to tell him that we've already lost the glacier that used to cover the whole country.

Perhaps he'll want to start working for new regulations from the Interior Department to begin immediately restoring this lost historical environmental treasure. Re-establishing a sheet of ice covering the entire continent would certainly serve to stop mining, timber cutting and urban sprawl.

The truth is, someday humans may be able to take tropical vacations at the North Pole - and it will be perfectly natural.

Yet our world is being flooded with the dire predictions of Global Warming.

We are being warned of killer heat waves, vast flooding and the spread of tropical diseases. Ocean levels are rising, they say. America's coast lines are doomed, they tell us. Hurricanes and tornadoes have already become more violent, we are warned. Floods and droughts have begun to ravage the nation, they cry.

Any change in temperatures, or an excessive storm or extended flooding is looked upon as a sure sign that environmental Armageddon is upon us. Diabolical environmentalists are using the natural El Nino phenomenon to whip people into a Global Warming hysteria.

I dont know who lied to you about there being no humans during the Pliocene. http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humano...ic/pliocene.htm

Nature produces 80 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year while Humans produce 20 billion tons.
One unactive volcano emits more than 130 million tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every year.

And whats the reason Israel has these weapon systems? We fucking gave it all too them...

"They don't really want nuclear weapons at this point"
and you know this how???
You dont know shit...Nor do i... All you know is what you read off these stupid liberal reports. Its become obvious your an Eviornazi who wants to pin all this shit on bush...
http://www.usa-patriot.net/chinspy4.shtml
http://www.vote.com/owth1/

The most shocking thing about Bill Clinton's presidency is the smallness of it, both personally and politically. This do nothing presidency left America weak and vulnerable. How dare we forget his appeasement toward North Korea, virtually inviting her to cheat on her nuclear agreements? Or how about his immediate retreat at the first sign of blood in Mogadishu and his persistent inaction in the face of recurring al-Qaida terrorism against American targets, both of which virtually invited the Sept. 11 attacks?How about Clinton's emasculation of the FBI and CIA? He not only loathed the military, but our vital intelligence services as well. he refocused the CIA on humanitarian interventions, economic security, the environment and a host of issues associated with global crime ... Terrorism was buried in a blizzard of other boutique, post-historical priorities.Clinton treated terrorism as a law-enforcement matter, rather than warfare. At Clinton's direction, the FBI became the lead agency in the war on terror – a task for which it was inherently unfit. As a law-enforcement agency, honor bound and structured to operate within the rules of evidence and the high standards of proof of American courtrooms, its hands were tied, and it was rendered ineffectual working against terrorism. The Clintons brag about deficit reduction during their years, but they conveniently omit that they tried to bankrupt the federal government through Hillary's grandiose and clandestine scheme to socialize health care. They also forget to mention that the Republican Congress restrained their other efforts to spend during the last six of their eight years in office.

Well said.

__________________

you and i sir will get along quite well, tho yeah i'm republican.. but i'm like far far right republican primarily cause any other party besides the communis...er democrats and the republicans have a snowballs chance in hell of ever getting elected

__________________

ya dude damn well said

__________________

Yes, you can find real scientists who are sure that global warming is with us. I've yet to read a report from a legitimate scientist challenging that fact.

If you had payed attention to what I said, I referred to the middle of the Pliocene, before the Pleistocene, which IS when the most recent series of Ice Ages started and WAS before humans existed. Get your facts straight and quit trying to twist my words. Remember, I never thought "through" was spelled "threw". Notice how I don't HAVE to twist your words to make you sound like an idiot.

Since you seem to be obsessed with CO2, perhaps I should mention it's not the only greenhouse gas that will be unregulated by the Bush administration. In February 2002, the Bush administration announced it would withdraw regulations for three major pollutants. These pollutants are mercury, sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide. Your attempts to diminish the harm CO2 causes probably seem kind of fruitless now. Perhaps you have some interesting figures explaining how SO2 and NO are good for the environment. I'd like to see that. Perhaps you have some more interesting figures that show that mercury poisoning is really for the greater good of America. Apparently George W. Bush thinks it is. Hell, maybe he's right, maybe we NEED kidney failure. Maybe kids enjoy intense pain in the extemities and being extremely afraid of light, both results of acrodynia (resulting in death 10% of the time), caused by mercury. But hell, who cares about kids when there's money to be made.

I believe what you meant to say was ENVIRO-NAZI, and I guess if caring about the future of the United States makes me an enviro-nazi, I am one. I guess if prioritizing the health of this nation's children over Bush trying to make money (and desperately try to fix the economy to make himself not look so bad) by removing needed laws makes me an enviro-nazi, then I am one for sure. If by your definition of enviro-nazi, you mean somebody who wants the people of this nation (and world) to be healthy and prosperous, the yes, I am an enviro-nazi. I've studied science avidly since I was a child, and I have always seen people like you. People who try to use skewed figures (often outright lies) to try to trick gullible people into believing that the environment does not need to be preserved.

You don't study science. That's pretty obvious. If you ever bothered to study science, you'd know the real problems, which you don't. You mindlessly vote republican year after year, because that's your party and you're sticking to it. I don't need to ask you to know that. In fact, honestly name one democrat or independent you ever voted for and I will recant that. I certainly know I haven't always voted democrat. You are easily tricked into believing half truths and whole lies. That's obvious by your mindless mimicking of them (i.e. the 'breakthrough' Saddam Hussein/terrorism connection, to which you never bothered to reply).

You keep going back to your mindless character assassination of Clinton, who if you haven't noticed, isn't president any more. So basically, even if half the things you were saying about Clinton were true (which they aren't), most of them wouldn't be relevant anyway. So keep droning on and on about how evil democrats are. I'm sure your panties are all up in a bunch when you hear somebody actually cares more about people and the well-being of this planet than big business and government fat cat liars.

By the way, if you are so concerned about this nation's crippling dependence on fossil fuels, which I doubt, then maybe you'd be interested to know that Bush's administration gave a $100,000 tax break for Hummers and the 38 worst gas guzzlers. Meanwhile, they got rid of the tax credit that gave Americans incentive to buy hybrids. I don't rely on so-called "liberal" reports for information, I seek out independent scientific reviews. It happens to be true that some environmentalists are liberal, although not all. As a matter of fact, and I'm sure you love this, most environmentalists happen to be upper middle class white suburbanites. Yes, the same demographic that constitutes the majority of republicans. There goes yet another of your ridiculous hypotheses. Thanks for playing, come back when you find a real argument and some real facts to back it up. You're making it far too easy for me to identify the gaping holes in your rebuttals right now, at least try to give me a challenge.

Is there enviro-nazi now? I thought there was only feminazi and enviro-fuckhead. I'll update my vocabulary. Thanks.

By the way, I'm not calling Chris a fuckhead. I actually like his argument a lot more, and not just because I dated a girl from Oregon. He really seems to know what he's talking about and it corresponds to what little I know on the subject. But there are fuckheads, and they deserve to bear the onus of the 'enviro-fuckhead' title.

Anarcho-capitalist is a fucking oxymoron, you are not an anarchist, and you share nothing in common with anarchists if you support capitalism.

Do not slur our name!

And to the people who said something about watching Farenheit 9/11, dont go watch it. Instead of watching something made by a stupid fat prick, watch a real documentary by Alex Jones called 9/11: The Road to Tyranny.

__________________

The EPA has never regulated mercury emissions from power plants.

In late 2003, the Bush Administration proposed a plan to cut mercury emissions from power plants by 40 percent by 2010, and 70 percent by 2018. It now is receiving public and interest group comments upon its proposal, with the intention of announcing a final regulation late in 2004.

The Bush plan uses a "cap and trade" mechanism. That is, overall U.S. mercury emissions from power plants would be capped. Individual power plant operators would be given a "pollution allotment." They could not exceed their allotment unless they purchased a "pollution credit" from another power plant operation that had emitted less mercury than allowed.

The EPA says of its decision to use a cap and trade mechanism: "We do believe that a type of cap and trade approach will allow us to get greater reductions in mercury emissions at lower cost."

By contrast, the Clinton-era EPA did not chose to impose a rule -- neither "cap and trade" or the more inflexible "command and control" (i.e., the government dictates exactly what plants must do) regulations -- on mercury emissions from power plants. What it did do was announce (in mid-December 2000, after George W. Bush had been elected), a draft proposal so draconian it would have been extremely expensive to the economy and, very possibly, scientifically/technically impossible to achieve.

Since the Clinton-Browner EPA proposed only a draft regulation and never a final rule, Clinton and Browner left office without regulating mercury emissions from power plants.

The Clinton-Browner EPA essentially created a political trap, apparently for the sole purpose of putting the then-incoming Bush Administration in a tight spot. On the one hand, it would have been hurtful to Americans had Bush adopted the proposal unchanged; on the other hand, if his Administration changed the Clinton-Browner draft, the left could charge -- as it now is doing -- that Bush was "rolling back" mercury regulations.

The Bush Administration chose to do the right thing policy-wise, but now is taking the political hit that is being administered now by Browner herself, MoveOn.org, the Environmental Working Group Action Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council and others.

It also is worth noting that a mercury crackdown doesn't matter as much as people are being led to believe. For instance, Harvard researchers recently failed to find any mercury-related health effects among regular consumers of swordfish, the most likely source of mercury exposure among Americans.

Among Seychelles Islanders in the Indian Ocean, who have little to eat except mercury-contaminated fish, the Rochester School of Medicine found no adverse mercury impacts among children. In fact, there's only one case of fish causing mercury poisoning in the scientific literature: At Japan's Minamata Bay, where tons of industrial mercury wastes were dumped into the water for more than 20 years. 46 people died and hundreds were sickened by this heavy, localized pollution. That sort of polluting is already illegal in the U.S. Americans' exposure to mercury was radically cut after adoption of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, popularly known as the Clean Water Act.

Other mercury emissions have been substantially cut through regulations on municipal, medical, and hazardous waste incinerators.

The EPA itself, during the Clinton Administration, said: "People who consume average amounts of a variety of commercially available fish as part of a balanced diet are not likely to consume harmful amounts of mercury.

I never said i was defending bush you dumb fuck. All i said is Clinton was no hero.

Pollution is real yes.
Global Warming Bull Shit.

You Talking shit about me making an error on a metal forum.
Childish

Saddam is a terrorist! Iraq, through its intelligence service, has attempted to sponsor or facilitate a number of covert attacks against U.S. interests. There were, for example, Iraq's sponsorship of a car-bombing attempt in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush in Kuwait City, Iraq's sponsorship in 1998 of the attempted recruitment of car bombers to destroy the headquarters building of Radio Free Europe in Wenceslas Square in the historic center of Prague, and Iraq's provision of fake identity papers and safe haven to two of the key figures in the 1993 truck bombing of the World Trade Center in New York.

"Yes, you can find real scientists who are sure that global warming is with us. I've yet to read a report from a legitimate scientist challenging that fact."

Yes, yes but no one can prove that humans have thing to do with it at all. That was the point...

oh and for the record i have no party.

speaking of saddam reminds me of a little tidbit i had from my school....
i was going down for my final during one of the liberal communist rallies to elect osama bin kerry, there was an asshole with a sign saying "saddam only tortured his own people, it's none of our business." what in the fucking hell kind of statement is that? all these fucks don't support the war and say this guy wasn't a threat? everyone knew what he was doing for fucks sake. i'm not going to get into the rest of how i feel or whether i think it was right etc cause i'm too tired to pull facts and history out and i just wanna go back to playing fable. anyway yeah that pissed me off and yeah saddam needed to go.

__________________

Anarcho-Capitalist is moron for 'Libertarian.' Ignore it. I did. I have more to say, but it's not my place, as I'm leaving. So I'm a 'fuck-you-allian.' Peace.

It is very hard to state a firm and scientifically proven case for either side of the argument. There are currently two camps within the scientific community that are diametrically opposed. You and Chris fill either side of the argument fervently. I am waiting for conclusive, uncontestable proof before I commit to one side or the other.



No. There is no landmass at the North Pole.

__________________

What the fuck are you talking about? Capitalism is the purest form of Anarchy.

__________________

I somewhat agree with you...

__________________

Every generation, it seems, must learn it's own lessons from it's own war, because every war is different and is fought by different ignorant young men
- Samuel Hynes,
The soldiers' tale

Only the dead have seen the end of war
- Plato


Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and they all stink to someone else.
- Some drunken philosopher

We should definately continue these debates, but before posting, everyone should pause and clear their animosity for the one who challenges their own belief. It's wasted emotion. It's becoming personal instead of global (I myself, admit to doing this). God or none, republican-democrat, idiot-idiot, We're all people, and we're all stuck in this world until someone presses that fucking button. So until then if we all put effort into loving one another. We may be able to have a place to raise our children in.

__________________

Well, some people aren't as optimistic, people can only change if they truly want to change.

__________________

Dude, you sound like a hippie. It makes me want to fucking puke.

__________________

...and you look like a hippy

Attached Images

sean2.jpg (25.2 KB, 56 views)

__________________

BOOOOYAH YOU JUST GOT SERVED WARMONGER!!


Post 420...*giggles and remembers when I was a huge pothead*

__________________

ah the giggling.
fond memories
giggling
giggling
laughing
chuckling
lookin around
wondering
thinking
doubting
PARANOIA


Memoirs of a former pothead
(smoked er chronic for years)

__________________

Yeah BOOOOOIIII.....will this lead to the topic of legalizing weed? It should be decriminalized...but that shit definately shouldn't be legal. It's still a drug, however more it affects you more temporarily than long term in my opinion.(From my experience and my loser friends who still constantly do it) And people who say it isn't a drug have'nt done it enough.

__________________

In my experience people who smoke weed are slow, unwitty, and don't give a shit about anything. In other words, never start a serious band with a pothead.

__________________

I think all drugs should be legal.

__________________

have another beer man. have another beer

__________________

I read some disturbing things written by a university professor about heroin (based on UK statistics):

1. From first contact with heroin, the average amount of time before a person stops taking it is 7 and a half years.

2. Thirty-seven percent of heroin users will be addicted to heroin for 25 years. A further 7 percent will be addicted to it for more than 25 years.

3. Only 4% of people who have taken heroin have done so only once.

Also, those who think that cannabis has none or only short term effects really should do more research. Here are some of the long term effects that cannabis causes:

1. Mouth cancer
2. Tongue cancer
3. Throat cancer
4. Lung cancer
5. Reduced sperm count, eventually leading to infertility
6. Paranoia
7. Increased risk of schizophrenia
8. Degeneration of the brain

Not to mention other effects such as the yellowing of fingers and teeth, laziness, the fact that potheads are excruciatingly boring when they are monged, and a very much increased chance of being introduced to harder drugs.

Harmless, isn't it?

__________________

Haha, sorry I've been awake for too long.

__________________

No weed isn't harmless...I've seen it fuck up several people's lives that's for sure...and well partially including mine. And it is highly likely people will go to other drugs because weed has it's limits.

__________________

I read just the first page. I am way behind on this thread, seeing as its not a good idea for me to get in political discussions.

I agree, America tends to think we control the world. If it doesn't pose a threat to us, I don't give a flying fuck. Bush went in there knowing there wasn't shit in there. But we went in under a lie. Bush has done so much damage to this country, and I, including future generations will end up paying for it. By paying for it, I mean the rebuilding of a country that seems to only want to blow itself up. Fuck that entire region, if you ask me. I think its best to stay out of that hemisphere's business. Since 9/11, we haven't accomplished SHIT, except invading two countries, and taking out 2 governments; both were supported by the US. We obviously helped Iraq against Iran (while helping Iran as well. How ass backwards is that?). And we supported the Taliban government not but a year before 9/11.



How do we know Osama Bin Laden did anything? Because of what the US government says? I don't speak their language, and neither do any of you. So how do we know what they are saying? For all I know, they could be denying their involvement. I'm not getting into that though.



I agree. Bush is THE worst president since Hoover, but that was way before our time.

Ahem. I have decided that I am not reading any more of that until after this. And pot makes you stupid. My friend was never that bright to begin with, but he wasn't fucking STUPID. Then he spent 9th grade smoking. And he is paying for it now. he failed that year, and is struggling now. Drugs harmless. Hah. Thats why I stopped smoking, because I even think that I got a wee bit dumber. And I didn't smoke that many times (20, absolute tops. and that was in a span of a year and a half.)

__________________

How did we know it was Osama?? Because he claimed responsibility for 9/11 maybe?! Come on you can't be THAT left, I think that if what he was saying wasn't properly transcribed someone would have the common decency to speak up! GET A HOLD OF YOURSELF MAN!

__________________

1.) While I am more left than right, but that has nothing to do with that.
2.) I was not suggesting that he had nothing to do with it, douche, I was merely pointing out the fact that they could say that he said anything, and I'm sure very few people would question it because they don't speak Arabic.
3.) Stfu.

__________________

reich wing bastards.

__________________

If he was responsible, why did the U.S. govt. cover up the pentagon destruction? It's like I can't trust anybody now. WTF?!

__________________

Paranoia is not really a long-term effect. I've smoked pot ~10 times in the past 7 years, so bear in mind that it will strongly affect me since I've done it so rarely. Depending on the quality of it, the paranoia comes about half an hour after the high sets in. It takes about 20 minutes for the high to set in with me, partly because I'm a pretty big dude. Most of the marijuana I've smoked was relatively low quality, causing nothing more than a mellow buzz that wears off in an hour or two.

The last couple of times I got high, in the fall and winter of 2003, it was with various college buddies. Both times it was at the house of this girl (also a college buddy) who is a pot aficionado (or burnout, depending on how you look at it). Both times we used a water bong. I'm not sure if it was the extremely high quality or if the was the fact that it was from a water bong (or both), but the first time, I got fucked up far more than I ever knew you could get off of marijuana. We smoked a LOT, and it took about 20 minutes for the high to set it on me. It did not slowly fade it, it was 20 minutes of being normal, and then BANG. I couldn't concentrate on anything, and several times I was talking to somebody and stopped mid-sentence after forgeting what I was talking about. I also blacked out several times for periods of about 2 seconds each, I could hear the muffled talking of everyone in the room, but my vision would turn gray and then black before being restored. I've never met anybody who's been affected like that before. We were watching a video of standup comedy, but I could not pay attention to it despite strenous efforts to do so.

Eventually, I started to get paranoid that getting me high was a plot to beat me or kill me. This was because my friends house had just gotten robbed, and in my paranoia I had started to think that she thought I did it, and not only that, but that she was trying to murder me as well. Obviously not everybody is so strongly affected, but it should be noted simply because if it happened to me, then it's possible. I became so paranoid that I decided to leave. A friend of the host that I had never met at that point gave me a ride to my cousin's house, where I could safely come down without worrying about any of my brothers seeing me in this state and deciding that meant it was okay for them to get high, too.

I stayed at his house until about 10PM, we watched old wrestling tapes and played video games the whole time. While we were playing video games (a baseball game for Game Cube), I asked my cousing why everybody in the audience was red, white, and blue. He kindly informed me that they WEREN'T red, white, and blue, at which point I noticed that they weren't. He had some fun with me, mostly by making really stupid jokes that knew I couldn't help but laugh at in my state. I knew what he was doing (I'm not sure how, but I did), but I couldn't seem to stop it and laughed at his surprisingly unfunny jokes. I was high for about 7 hours. I still had a light buzz when I got home, but nothing too strong for me to seem abnormal to anybody.

I'm not really sure why I did it the second time, although sometimes when people goad you, you'll do it just to shut them up. I only took 2 hits off the bong this time, and to my surprise, I got just as high, but not for nearly as long. The paranoia also returned, although since I was only high for a few hours, it didn't give it enough time to really build.

Undoubtedly some of you will immediately think the reason I was so strongly affected was because of perhaps some added drugs in the marijuana, perhaps a light hallucinogen. I'm certain that wasn't the case, and I will explain why. First off, most people there weren't close associates, and had never been to each other's houses before or anything like that. Second, everybody in there (except me) had one thing in common, and that was that they all got smoked weed a lot. If it were 'spiked', someone else there would have definitely noticed a difference between the hallucinogen and the pot they were so used to.

I bring this up just so people who have never smoked pot before will have an understanding to what it can be like. It's not always bad. Very much in life is fine in moderation. I've also seen from all the people around me that moderation doesn't prevent addiction, and pot is more addictive than many people would like to admit. I've known too many burnouts in my short 20 years to believe that pot is not very strongly addictive.

..................potsmokin' hippie......

__________________

Exactly...

but hey alchohol is legal and its just as bad.. maybe even worse.

__________________

I was referring to the long term paranoia caused by prolonged and frequent use of cannabis. It's brought on by a permanent chemical imbalance in the brain that is borne from cannabis smoking. Imagine feeling like you described in the rest of your post every day of your life.

BLS: Alcohol is a different subject all together. Cannabis, no matter how small a dose is taken, will damage your body and brain. Alcohol on the other hand, is actually beneficial in small quantities - consuming up to 2 pints of lager a day works towards protecting you against heart disease.

__________________

exactly bls.
And just sounds like you smoked some primo weed chris. If you've got weed that's potent enough, it can cause you to trip.

__________________

michael moore knows who slayer is.


"If you have never had this happen to you, I insist you try it at least once in your life. It is better than an angry mosh pit at a Slayer concert. As a quiet salute to Beavis and Butthead, I held up my index finger and thumb in an "L" — the international sign for loser — which is what I hope their candidate is about to become."

__________________

http://www.consumptionjunction.com/...=1&page=1&fav=0

(warning, there are porn ad banners right next to the video)

__________________

That was kinda cool, just because it was making fun of Bush. Snoop Dogg For Prez in 2008.

__________________

I can't believe it. That was awesome. The look on Bush's face, ha, he looked like he was about to cry

__________________

That was awesome. Who made that.
I think bush was scared of the guy.

__________________

"Nothing's perfect in life, so you have an election that's not quite perfect. Is it better than not having an election? You bet" - Donald Rumsfeld.

__________________

I'm surprised nobody has picked up on that Rumsfeld quote concerning Iraq's upcoming election, yet.

__________________

i'm surprised no one has picked up on my photoshopped pic of Mayhem
i mean, come on! IT RULEZ

http://metaltabs.com/forum/attachme...tachmentid=3417

__________________

I noticed, I laughed to myself, but I didn't respond because I didn't want to encourage you. Who knows what the fuck you'll come up with next if I did! Then again, maybe I shouldn't care, I've posted some fucked up shit.