i played two kirk hammet signature guitars and i was wondering if the M-II has the same type of neck as those guitars. I really like how the hammets fit my hand but i want a maple fretboard because they look cool and sound good.

__________________

go play one.

__________________

Well, easier said than done if one isn't available to play.

Innards, are we talking the ESP or LTD series, or one of each? Each series has a neck-thru and bolt-on version, each of which tend to feel very different to the other simply because of the finish, let alone whether they are the same neck shape. I believe the M-II of the same look has a bolt-on neck. Considering the KH series is based around the M-II design, I dare say the necks would be the same if they are both bolt-on. But I've only played one of the KH series (I can't remember which, but it was a neck-thru version) and not the M-II, so I'm only guessing.

Im pretty sure their both LTDs. I may be wrong though. If you like the neck then go for it.

__________________

well, the kh-2 and M-II are both real esps... i really like the Kh-2s sound and neck... but i dont like the hammet shit all over it. It'd be different if it was the hanneman guitar with the "offensive" inlay...

__________________

I don't know man, but I was trying out a couple of his sig guitars the other day, and is it just me or are the finished necks on the cheaper versions (eg kh-202) fucking crap? Felt like a crap version of a wizard, and the finish was really really grippy

well, ive played the true sig (kh-2) and the ltd with 81s (kh-602) and both had really nice necks that let me move pretty freely without having to worry like those fucking wizard 1s that get hairline cracks so very easily.

__________________