- your source for Metal tabs
Home Forum What's New Submit a Tab FAQ Links Contact Us Link to Us

Go Back Forum > > Chit Chat
User Name

Thread Tools
Old 2010-06-24, 01:19
blitz906's Avatar
blitz906 blitz906 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,137
Send a message via MSN to blitz906 Send a message via Yahoo to blitz906
inb4 thread locked.
Originally Posted by Paddy
Chances are there have been Irish in every corner of the world, no matter how remote. Our semen is listed in the World Health Organisation's Big Book of Pestilential Materials.
Originally Posted by CompelledToLacerate
God, the Japanese are so weird. This HAS to be the long term effects of the atom bombs. No one is that weird on purpose.
Originally Posted by Gomli
The slams in that song always kill me. First time I heard that song I was like "Too much heaviness - brain collapse" but now I could murder my family to that one
Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-24, 04:49
Dystopia's Avatar
Dystopia Dystopia is offline
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,068
Send a message via AIM to Dystopia
Originally Posted by blitz906
inb4 thread locked.

Not like you're going to discuss this in a serious way anyways.

To anyone who criticizes my idea: You have a better one? Legalize drugs completely? Keep drugs illegal? Make drugs more illegal?

Fact is, I understand both sides of the issue, rather than being completely leaning to one side. I understand drugs destroy communities (But pot doesn't lol), and druggies simply cannot be destroyed. It would violate the physics of the Constitution. So, here I give you: The Ultimate COMPROMISE. Giving both sides a little of what they want.

Druggies get their drugs.
And communities get their druggies the fuck out.

k, rdy4lock *hides in bomb shelter*
Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-24, 06:25
Paddy Paddy is offline
Forum Daemon
Forum Leader
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,745
Originally Posted by Dystopia
To anyone who criticizes my idea: You have a better one?
Nope, which is why none has been offered. I think it's healthy to know one's limitations, which means not cramming every passing thought into the knowledge gap like you're trying to fill a pothole with the contents of your trash can. The stuff you've written is the kind of thing one thinks about when they're sitting on the toilet or laying in the bathtub. We think these insane things, and immediately dismiss them as insane and only share them with other people for a laugh. You seem to be lacking that particular faculty, and pot undoubtedly has to bear some of the blame for that.

The lack of an alternative to your idea doesn't give your idea any extra weight. It might have done if your idea wasn't inherently mental. Reading your first post it's clear that you just started writing, and as you were writing these ideas just started popping into your head and then became part of the overall tapestry of nonsense which constitutes your letter to Bill.

If I'm wrong about that, and if you've thought long and hard about these ideas, then you surely must have worked out the possible [probable] problems with them. Tells us everything that could go wrong with a drug town, and how you'd deal with it. In fact, do the same for your entire letter. Be your own prosecution and see if you can pick apart your proposals, and then people might start taking them seriously if they survive.
Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-24, 11:49
Dystopia's Avatar
Dystopia Dystopia is offline
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,068
Send a message via AIM to Dystopia
K, I understand it would lead to massive smuggling if not attempting to smuggle.

Smuggling OUT, would be a fucking pain in the ass, since getting out would be a pain in the ass. There are different extents to this bill.

1 - Total freedom.
2 - Limited freedom, family can visit you SOMETIMES, and you could visit them rarely.
3 - Total isolation. So goodbye to everyone not in drug town where you're going, but you don't care - that's why you chose drugs. Hell, it don't even have to be a city, or a town, or a sector. Make it a fuckin' prison. Better yet, just give prisoners.. just kidding. No seriously, empty out a big ass prison and put a bunch of crackheads right in ther'.

I would probably choose limited freedom. Letting them have their own sectors, their own freedoms. Sure, the potential risk of corruption would be high, but the mentality would change.

If doing drugs are officially legal, and now it is dealing drugs to a minor that becomes the big risk-taker, cokeheads just won't give a shit, cuz they know they will get popped for that so they would rather keep their drugs risk-free. On the street TODAY, it is ALL illegal. Hey, snort illegal, may as well sell illegal, right?

Also, public opinion would change, how is dependent on variable(s).
I would keep the opinion on drugs low, but I wouldn't try to make them miserable. Hell, they'd be havin' a blast! But they would have much higher death rates in their own sectors, which is ok, because it's not in the community, and they're just hard drug users.

I've been on and off the weedz, cuz I need a job.
Last quarter at college I was way fuckin' high and WAY TOO tired, the whole damn time, and my homework was often turned in late. I got 2 A's and 1 B.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28.


Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Copyright © 2001-2009 All Rights Reserved.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.