2012-09-22, 07:35
|
 |
Attorney at Bird Law
Forum Leader
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Alone here, with emptiness, eagles, and snow...
Posts: 3,556
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by estringrev
Just checked out Warbringer and was pleasantly surprised.. One of the things I did notice is much cleaner production than a lot of the older stuff. Comes with the territory since technology progresses, but I do think the rougher production of the older material does add a dimension to the music that probably will be lost on newer bands.
Would use the word "nostalgic", but I didn't start listening to any sort of metal till the early 2000's.
|
Eh, same situation with me. With the exceptions of some Sabbath, Zeppelin, Metallica, and Megadeth type stuff (not radio friendly, but radio acceptable), I didn't really start listening to metal until around 1998. I definitely wasn't getting deep into the thrash stuff until the summer of 1998, starting finding all sorts of tapes and gobbled 'em up like a hungry, hungry, hippo. Nonetheless, I generally think that my occasional preference for a dirty production is just a nostalgic thing. The reason I figure this is that it generally only applies to albums I grew up listening to a lot; old Megadeth, Slayer, Anthrax, Nasty Savage, Nuclear Assault, and so on, but NOT any thrash that I've gotten into the past 5 years or so.
__________________
Trust in god, he'll give you shoes!
|