My conclusion is that the top 20 is about right, with the rest being just a slew of semi-random bands in a semi-random order. The journalists are only going to make sure that the top 20 is giving the message they want to give, the rest is just name-checking in no particular order and, to me, irrelevant (hence why I initially only posted the top 20).

Needless to say the list is five years old so it's a little unfair to judge some of the bands' positions in that list according to the esteem they may have garnered since.

__________________